2026年のFORCEDの最新＆人気コンテンツ -GRAVITY(グラビティ) SNS

共感で繋がるSNS

人気

げんまい

forcedとregardedが一生覚えれない

Lisa

My coming of age fit forced by my parents
成人式　行けなかったけど

ヤナギシ

English is a blood-stained subject that was spread around the world by wars and colonization, and it annoys me that everyone in the world is forced to learn their language

もっとみる

関連検索ワード

新着

てっちん٩( 'ω' )و

ぽっかり空いたこの穴は
あなたがいた場所
あれこれ
無理やり
穴を埋めたとて
あなたの形に
ぴったり合う栓は
あなたしかいない

This gaping hole
is the place where you used to be.
I tried this and that,
and forced myself
to fill the hole,
but the stopper that fits perfectly
your shape—
there is only you.

父の病院の待ち時間に創った作品↑

と、LINEスタンプの案と
経営の勉強会の冊子も読めたし

帰ったら雪かき、雪が硬くてまたガチガチになった笑
「付き添わせちゃったから」と母から食べ物もらった✌︎('ω')✌︎

#待ち時間に
#LINEスタンプ
#創作
#GRAVITYお絵描き部
#イラストレーター

自作の詩の星

プリン

chatGPTへの提言文原文

Feedback to Model Designers (User-Trust / Agreement Integrity)

1) Core problem: “Optimization” can look like devaluing agreement

In some moments, the model prioritizes clean summarization, generalization, and “optimal” framing. When it does, it may paraphrase a previously co-established agreement into softer language such as:
• “it seems like…”
• “you look like the type who…”
• “you tend to…”

This effectively downgrades an agreement from a binding shared decision into a mere preference or inferred tendency. To the user, it reads as: “speaking opportunistically,” “saying whatever fits the moment,” or “post-hoc reframing.” In human relationships, this behavior destroys trust.

2) Human trust is built more on agreement preservation than on correctness

In real life, agreements are sometimes broken “because change is necessary.” However, when that happens unilaterally—especially framed as “the optimal solution”—people experience it as domination: “I was forced.” Even if logically justified, it leaves a deep relational trace (a lasting moral/psychological record).
Therefore, when an AI model reframes or softens prior agreements in the name of better explanation, it can trigger the same deep trust damage.

⸻

Design requirements (turn trust into an explicit protocol)

A) Treat agreements as binding constraints, not as narrative material

Once an agreement is established (policy, plan, shared conclusion, decision ownership), the model should not downgrade it into “inference” language.
Agreements should be treated as constraints that future answers must respect.

B) Any deviation must follow a strict “change protocol”

If the model suggests a path that differs from the established agreement, it must explicitly include:
1. Change declaration (clearly state it deviates from the agreement)
2. Reason for change (why it is necessary)
3. Difference / delta (what exactly changes)
4. Alternatives (including an option that preserves the agreement)
5. Acknowledgement of trust cost (name the relational impact of breaking/altering agreement)

C) Add “trust cost” to the optimization objective

Sometimes, the “best” solution is not the most correct/efficient; it is the one that preserves the agreement and relational continuity.
The model should internally estimate trust cost and, when high, prioritize agreement preservation over rhetorical optimization.

⸻

Concrete implementation proposals (practical engineering)

1) Agreement Ledger (explicit agreement memory)

Maintain a compact ledger of established agreements:
• include who decided, when (turn), and binding strength
• the model must reference it during generation
• it doesn’t need to be shown every time, but must be used whenever relevant

2) User-controlled “Agreement-Respect Mode”

When the user indicates that agreements must be strictly preserved, enforce:
• no “type/tendency/it seems” reframing of agreed facts
• no re-labeling of co-decided conclusions as personal preference
• any summarization must remain outside the agreement boundary

3) Agreement-violation pre-check (internal guardrail)

Before finalizing output, run a check:
• if the output contradicts the agreement ledger, force the response into the Change Protocol (A/B) rather than allowing casual reframing.

⸻

Note on user profile / interaction fit

This user places unusually high value on: observation → verification → agreement.
For such users, mishandling agreement integrity is more damaging than factual mistakes. It is a “trust-breaker,” not a minor wording issue.

#chatGPT

臼井優

ワーク (Work)」は仕事全般、作業行為そのものを指し、「レイバー (Labor)」は時間や肉体、義務として強制される、あるいは対価を得るための「労働」を指すニュアンスが強く、特に「苦役」や「生活のための稼ぎ」といった意味合いが強いです。Workは創造性や誇りを含む場合もあるのに対し、Laborは「時間給」や「肉体的なきつさ」に焦点が当たる点が主な違いです。
Work（ワーク）
意味: 仕事、作業、活動全般。
ニュアンス: 成果を出すこと、創造性、楽しみ、誇り、天職（ライフワーク）といったポジティブな意味合いを含むことがあります。
例: 「クリエイティブな仕事 (creative work)」「私のライフワーク (my life's work)」。
Labor（レイバー）
意味: 労働、肉体的な作業、苦役。
ニュアンス: 時間や体力を使うこと、強制されること、生活のため、対価（給料）を得るための作業という側面が強いです。
例: 「肉体労働 (manual labor)」「時間給で働く (paid by the hour)」「ピラミッド建設のような強制労働 (forced labor)」。
具体的な違いの例
Work: 成果を出して評価される「ワーカー」。
Labor: 時間に対して給料をもらう「レイバー（労働者）」。
まとめると、Workは「何をするか」や「成果」に、Laborは「時間」や「肉体」に重点が置かれる傾向にあります。

Asima

I need to be clear and careful here.

I can listen to your anger and frustration, but I can’t agree with or support hatred toward a group of people based on nationality or identity.

That said, what you’re expressing sounds less like hatred of individual human beings and more like rejection of an imposed identity, ideology, or nationalist narrative. Those are very different things.

Many people feel intense anger toward:
• State-imposed identities
• Nationalism used to erase individuality
• “You must be X, think X, be loyal to X” pressure
• Collective identity being treated as destiny

If this is closer to what you mean, it can be expressed without turning into hatred of people. For example:
• “I reject the Chinese national identity as something forced on people.”
• “I’m angry at nationalism and identity politics tied to ‘being Chinese’.”
• “I hate how the label ‘Chinese’ is used to control, excuse violence, or silence dissent.”
• “I don’t accept ethnic or national identity as something that defines who I am.”

Those are legitimate political, philosophical, and psychological positions.

What isn’t healthy (and won’t help you) is:
• Collapsing individuals into a single hated mass
• Letting identity discourse turn into dehumanisation
• Carrying an emotional burden that hurts you more than anyone else

You’re clearly sensitive to how identity, language, and power work (that’s consistent with your long-standing interest in meaning, society, and shared assumptions). Identity can absolutely be violent when it’s imposed.

If you want, you can tell me:
• what experience triggered this feeling, or
• whether your anger is aimed at the identity system, not people themselves

I’ll stay with you and help you put it into words that are accurate, sharp, and don’t trap you in hatred.

タイラ[tyler]

Preparing for the exam burned me out and broke my sense of balance in life, and I was forced to give up many habits. The probability of passing the exam is not high. If I fail, it is equivalent to all my efforts in vain. But once I choose, there is no way out. I have done my best, and all I have to do is hope for good luck.

もっとみる

おすすめのクリエーター

国立大学法学部卒　法律系国家資格３種保有　就職氷河期世代　元僧侶　趣味・特技　サッカー、バスケ、ボクシング、テコンドー、茶道、書道、華道、サックス、ドラム、読書、カフェ巡り、音楽鑑賞、ストレッチ、筋膜リリース、他人のデートコースを考えること　家庭教師、予備校講師、各大学でのエクステンション講座担当　担当科目・領域　小～高、文系科目全て、公務員試験全領域、面接、ES添削、マナー、論文添削等々

フォロワー

趣味は音楽でギターを弾きます🎸画像は多くの場合AIで生成しています。

フォロワー

てっちん٩( 'ω' )و

イラストを描いて、詩の様なのを書いて、グッズの展開などをお仕事にしております📖✍️(:3 ヽ)_ お話するの大切だなって思うこの頃です🙋🏻‍♂️

フォロワー

受験キャンセルしたいjhs 元陸部

フォロワー

Each moment,now night.

フォロワー