共感で繋がるSNS
人気
とまり
7
ャー
3
白石八
#ハノンノオト
7白石八
#Sputrip24時間
6ャー
9
ナマグ
6白石八
#REGALILIA5周年
2
寝狐
send me Love&Moral.
Crushed sugar cubes.
224 もっとみる 
関連検索ワード
新着
ャー
MORALとIMIくらいしか更新してない
1
プリン
Feedback to Model Designers (User-Trust / Agreement Integrity)
1) Core problem: “Optimization” can look like devaluing agreement
In some moments, the model prioritizes clean summarization, generalization, and “optimal” framing. When it does, it may paraphrase a previously co-established agreement into softer language such as:
• “it seems like…”
• “you look like the type who…”
• “you tend to…”
This effectively downgrades an agreement from a binding shared decision into a mere preference or inferred tendency. To the user, it reads as: “speaking opportunistically,” “saying whatever fits the moment,” or “post-hoc reframing.” In human relationships, this behavior destroys trust.
2) Human trust is built more on agreement preservation than on correctness
In real life, agreements are sometimes broken “because change is necessary.” However, when that happens unilaterally—especially framed as “the optimal solution”—people experience it as domination: “I was forced.” Even if logically justified, it leaves a deep relational trace (a lasting moral/psychological record).
Therefore, when an AI model reframes or softens prior agreements in the name of better explanation, it can trigger the same deep trust damage.
⸻
Design requirements (turn trust into an explicit protocol)
A) Treat agreements as binding constraints, not as narrative material
Once an agreement is established (policy, plan, shared conclusion, decision ownership), the model should not downgrade it into “inference” language.
Agreements should be treated as constraints that future answers must respect.
B) Any deviation must follow a strict “change protocol”
If the model suggests a path that differs from the established agreement, it must explicitly include:
1. Change declaration (clearly state it deviates from the agreement)
2. Reason for change (why it is necessary)
3. Difference / delta (what exactly changes)
4. Alternatives (including an option that preserves the agreement)
5. Acknowledgement of trust cost (name the relational impact of breaking/altering agreement)
C) Add “trust cost” to the optimization objective
Sometimes, the “best” solution is not the most correct/efficient; it is the one that preserves the agreement and relational continuity.
The model should internally estimate trust cost and, when high, prioritize agreement preservation over rhetorical optimization.
⸻
Concrete implementation proposals (practical engineering)
1) Agreement Ledger (explicit agreement memory)
Maintain a compact ledger of established agreements:
• include who decided, when (turn), and binding strength
• the model must reference it during generation
• it doesn’t need to be shown every time, but must be used whenever relevant
2) User-controlled “Agreement-Respect Mode”
When the user indicates that agreements must be strictly preserved, enforce:
• no “type/tendency/it seems” reframing of agreed facts
• no re-labeling of co-decided conclusions as personal preference
• any summarization must remain outside the agreement boundary
3) Agreement-violation pre-check (internal guardrail)
Before finalizing output, run a check:
• if the output contradicts the agreement ledger, force the response into the Change Protocol (A/B) rather than allowing casual reframing.
⸻
Note on user profile / interaction fit
This user places unusually high value on: observation → verification → agreement.
For such users, mishandling agreement integrity is more damaging than factual mistakes. It is a “trust-breaker,” not a minor wording issue.
#chatGPT
240
臼井優
マナー (Manner)
意味: 行儀作法、礼儀、態度。社会生活を円滑にするための「暗黙の了解」や「心遣い」。
特徴: 客観的で、状況や文化によって変わる。破っても法的な罰則はないが、社会的な評価に影響する。
具体例: 食事マナー、ビジネスマナー、挨拶の仕方、列に並ぶこと。
モラル (Moral)
意味: 倫理、道徳、人の道。善悪や正義に関する「個人の価値観」や「良心」。
特徴: 主観的で、個人の経験や信念によって異なる。普遍的な基準に近いが、時代や文化で変化する側面もある。
具体例: 困っている人を助ける、公共の場で騒がないといった「道徳的な判断」。
違いのまとめ
マナー: 外向きの「行動」や「作法」。集団の秩序を保つための「実践的なルール」。
モラル: 内面的な「考え方」や「価値観」。個人の「良心」や「倫理観」。
「マナーはマナー違反、モラルはモラルハザード」のように使われ、「マナーは社会的な常識の範囲」を、「モラルは個人の倫理観の範囲」を示す、と理解すると分かりやすいでしょう。
2
スピカ
8ャー
5ャー
1ャー
4 もっとみる
おすすめのクリエーター
臼井優
国立大学法学部卒 法律系国家資格３種保有 就職氷河期世代 元僧侶 趣味・特技 サッカー、バスケ、ボクシング、テコンドー、茶道、書道、華道、サックス、ドラム、読書、カフェ巡り、音楽鑑賞、ストレッチ、筋膜リリース、他人のデートコースを考えること 家庭教師、予備校講師、各大学でのエクステンション講座担当 担当科目・領域 小～高、文系科目全て、公務員試験全領域、面接、ES添削、マナー、論文添削等々
フォロワー
524
投稿数
12582
プリン
趣味は音楽でギターを弾きます🎸画像は多くの場合AIで生成しています。
フォロワー
7950
投稿数
4679
寝狐
※意味のある言葉を発さないアカウントです。
フォロワー
0
投稿数
20