共感で繋がるSNS
人気
セレク
8
ナビジ
1
ハピネ
7
カイン
2ナビジ
1
ワーク
1
キャリ
4
イーエ
8
ワーク
1ナビジ
2 もっとみる 
関連検索ワード
新着
プリン
Feedback to Model Designers (User-Trust / Agreement Integrity)
1) Core problem: “Optimization” can look like devaluing agreement
In some moments, the model prioritizes clean summarization, generalization, and “optimal” framing. When it does, it may paraphrase a previously co-established agreement into softer language such as:
• “it seems like…”
• “you look like the type who…”
• “you tend to…”
This effectively downgrades an agreement from a binding shared decision into a mere preference or inferred tendency. To the user, it reads as: “speaking opportunistically,” “saying whatever fits the moment,” or “post-hoc reframing.” In human relationships, this behavior destroys trust.
2) Human trust is built more on agreement preservation than on correctness
In real life, agreements are sometimes broken “because change is necessary.” However, when that happens unilaterally—especially framed as “the optimal solution”—people experience it as domination: “I was forced.” Even if logically justified, it leaves a deep relational trace (a lasting moral/psychological record).
Therefore, when an AI model reframes or softens prior agreements in the name of better explanation, it can trigger the same deep trust damage.
⸻
Design requirements (turn trust into an explicit protocol)
A) Treat agreements as binding constraints, not as narrative material
Once an agreement is established (policy, plan, shared conclusion, decision ownership), the model should not downgrade it into “inference” language.
Agreements should be treated as constraints that future answers must respect.
B) Any deviation must follow a strict “change protocol”
If the model suggests a path that differs from the established agreement, it must explicitly include:
1. Change declaration (clearly state it deviates from the agreement)
2. Reason for change (why it is necessary)
3. Difference / delta (what exactly changes)
4. Alternatives (including an option that preserves the agreement)
5. Acknowledgement of trust cost (name the relational impact of breaking/altering agreement)
C) Add “trust cost” to the optimization objective
Sometimes, the “best” solution is not the most correct/efficient; it is the one that preserves the agreement and relational continuity.
The model should internally estimate trust cost and, when high, prioritize agreement preservation over rhetorical optimization.
⸻
Concrete implementation proposals (practical engineering)
1) Agreement Ledger (explicit agreement memory)
Maintain a compact ledger of established agreements:
• include who decided, when (turn), and binding strength
• the model must reference it during generation
• it doesn’t need to be shown every time, but must be used whenever relevant
2) User-controlled “Agreement-Respect Mode”
When the user indicates that agreements must be strictly preserved, enforce:
• no “type/tendency/it seems” reframing of agreed facts
• no re-labeling of co-decided conclusions as personal preference
• any summarization must remain outside the agreement boundary
3) Agreement-violation pre-check (internal guardrail)
Before finalizing output, run a check:
• if the output contradicts the agreement ledger, force the response into the Change Protocol (A/B) rather than allowing casual reframing.
⸻
Note on user profile / interaction fit
This user places unusually high value on: observation → verification → agreement.
For such users, mishandling agreement integrity is more damaging than factual mistakes. It is a “trust-breaker,” not a minor wording issue.
#chatGPT
240
ひろ✨
代表的な生成モデルには、確率的生成モデル（Probabilistic Generative Models） と 深層生成モデル（Deep Generative Models） がある。前者には混合ガウスモデル（GMM）や隠れマルコフモデル（HMM）などが含まれるが、近年主流となっているのは後者であり、ニューラルネットワークによる高次元分布の近似を行う。特に有名なのが、変分オートエンコーダ（VAE）、敵対的生成ネットワーク（GAN）、および**拡散モデル（Diffusion Model）**である。
VAEはエンコーダ・デコーダ構造を持ち、潜在空間における確率的表現学習を行う。GANはジェネレータとディスクリミネータの**ミニマックス最適化（minimax optimization）**によって、分布近似を競合的に洗練させる。一方、Diffusion Modelはノイズ除去過程を逐次的に学習し、高品質なサンプル生成を可能にする。この拡散モデル系は、**スコアベース生成（Score-based Generation）**とも呼ばれ、現在の画像生成（例：Stable Diffusion、DALL·E、Midjourney）や動画生成の中心技術となっている。
また、自然言語領域では、自己回帰型言語モデル（Autoregressive Language Model）が主流であり、Transformerアーキテクチャを基盤とする。GPTやLLaMAなどは、トークン列の条件付き確率 P(x_t|x_{<t}) を逐次推定し、テキストを生成する。これにより、文脈保持・推論・スタイル模倣などの高次言語生成能力が実現している。
さらに近年では、マルチモーダル統合（text-to-image, text-to-video, text-to-audioなど）が進み、生成系AIは単一モーダルの枠を超えて「統合的創発（emergent multimodality）」を示すに至った。これは巨大パラメータ空間と自己教師あり学習（self-supervised learning）による**表現学習の汎化（representation generalization）**の成果であり、人間の創造的活動の一部を模倣・拡張する段階に入っている。
要するに生成系AIとは、確率的表現学習・深層分布近似・モーダル統合によって新たなデータを創出する人工知能技術体系であり、単なる情報処理を超え、創造の自動化を実現する計算的パラダイムである。
AIの星
4イーエ
6 もっとみる