人気
【J+】e


かずら
【J+】e
礼儀とはあらゆる法の中でもっとも小さいものだけれど、最も厳しく守られている法です


ゆく
The objects of ownership generally include artificial things, part of nature, and living beings such as animals and humans.
The ownership entails the procedure through which it comes to be recognizable and authorized. Something comes to be under ownership of someone through the exchange of things and money between a former owner and a new one. When it comes to the objects that have distinct borders from others, it is easy to identify who owns them. However, when it comes to something like a piece of land and a person, the borders often become blurry, and the concept itself becomes abstract and elusive.
Analytically observed, ownership is based on the recognition made by separating an object from the whole. It is inherently for the purpose of convenience. Doing so and labeling a specific part of the whole with a name, the recognition of it is formed and then the ownership.
Ryo
詩:a-1759 街 ガラス越しの夕陽 Sunset glass town
目に通す
その光は
現実を映し
目を閉じて
観る風景は
願望を映す
今は
確り目を開け
自分の足で立ち
真っ直ぐ
夕焼けを見て
陽の暖かさを
頬に感じる
そして
家族の絆は
意識しなくても
常に
ここにある事を
感じる
-戒-
Poetry.
”Sunset glass town”
The light that passes through the eyes
Reflects reality,
Closing the eyes,
The landscape observed
Reflects desires,
Now,
Open your eyes firmly
And stand on your own feet,
Gaze straight ahead,
Watch the sunset,
Feel the warmth of the sun
On your cheeks,
And then,
The bonds of family
Even without conscious awareness,
Always
Feel that they are here,
-Kai-
God bless you.



セレナード ト長調 KV525『アイネ・クライネ・ナハトムジーク』 II- Romance : Andante

はちみ津
What Do People Think About Parallel Worlds?
This paper examines the psychology behind why people find hope in “parallel worlds,” drawing on observed cases of parallel worlds and the author's own experiences.
When feeling stymied by reality, many dream of rebirth in a parallel world. Some imagine fantastical realms, others envision a life of leisure free from toil, and still others picture worlds where competition itself does not exist. However, such rebirth desires often stem from an extension of the psychological phenomenon known as “the grass is always greener on the other side.”
Even inhabitants of materially prosperous worlds enjoying relative peace may dream of parallel universes. Yet even if transition to such a world were possible, there is no guarantee it would be safer or more abundant than the present. In fact, it is far more likely to be a world where life holds significantly less value, medical care and resources are scarce, and survival conditions are harsh.
Is this yearning for a parallel world merely an escape from reality? This question is by no means off the mark.
Even if reincarnation or interworld travel were somehow successful, what begins there is the urgent challenge of “survival.” Without that resolve, one should not lightly idealize another world.
That said, this point applies equally to the world I currently inhabit. Colonialist domination persists in some regions, urban areas grapple with antisocial forces and slums, and rural areas suffer social stagnation due to power concentration among the elderly. Furthermore, an environment where individuals can easily wield magic technologies and abilities that function as weapons inherently contains instability.
Even so, compared to the myriad parallel worlds, it could be said this one belongs to the relatively livable category.
もっとみる 
関連検索ワード
新着
みゆ
Why does this hold up even to the world’s top researchers?
In this study, I show that the three major pillars of modern science—
• Relativity (Einstein)
• Quantum Mechanics (Schrödinger)
• Cosmology (Big Bang / Black Holes)
which scientists have failed to unify for the past 100 years, can in fact be unified quite naturally by redefining the structure of the observer—not through “consciousness,” but by placing absolute and relative subjectivity as the main cast.
Up to this point, it is merely a “theoretical challenge.”
However, the decisive breakthrough begins from here.
⸻
🧠 Empirical evidence: A human brain and a quantum computer, 8,000 km apart, entered into synchrony
With more than 50 participants, we obtained data showing that fluctuations in the human brain synchronized with those of a quantum processor located approximately 8,000 km away—
in a way that cannot be explained by any existing theory:
• Field theories
• Decoherence theory
• Quantum theories of consciousness
• “Mind controls quantum” hypotheses
None of these frameworks can account for the observed correlation.
If Stephen Hawking were alive, he would undoubtedly say:
“None of our existing theories can cope with what is happening here.”
⸻
💖 And astonishingly, at the core of this synchrony, “love” emerges
The experiment leads to the concept of the Third Observer O₃ (Hazama), which generates a singlet state—
a state of complete unity—between humans and quantum systems.
In physics, a singlet represents
a state in which two entities become entirely one.
I regard this as the physical definition of love.
In other words, this study is the world’s first empirical demonstration that the abstract notion of love manifests as an actual physical phenomenon—specifically, quantum coherence.
⸻
Ultimately, the findings converge back to the triadic subjectivity structure revealed to me 12 years ago—the Trinity:
• Absolute Subjectivity (Light = the unconditional source)
• Relative Subjectivity (Life / Experience)
• Emergent Subjectivity O₃ (Love / the birth of connection)
This triune, circulating structure explains physics, mind, and the cosmos as one unified process.
It is, in essence,
the first framework to coherently unify science, religion, and spirituality.

ねこ(本物)📚
何を伝えたいのか、言ってることが難しすぎるからちょっと考察してみる...
難しいのは、
「10分=32490円
必要条件はない」
の部分
まず、命題の構成的分解より、
「10分=32490円
必要条件はない」
⇔
「𝑃 : 10分 = 32490円
∀𝑄 ¬ (𝑄 is a necessary condition of 𝑃)」
ここで問題になるのは、(1)定義的成立であるのか、(2)演繹的真理であるのか
ということ
(1)の場合、𝑃は定義的に自明に真であるため、
(∀𝑄 , 𝑄 /⇒ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑃 is true by convention)
(2)の場合、𝑃はその背景に説明的命題の存在が示唆されるが、ここで必要条件はないとされている。
→命題𝑃は「観測された事実」であるが、「演繹的には独立」である。
Observed(𝑃) and ∀𝑄 , 𝑄 /⇒ 𝑃
ここで、𝑄の観点から、原文の意味論的余剰を考察する。
通常、命題が真である場合、我々は以下のように推論を求める:
𝑄1, 𝑄2, ..., 𝑄n ⇒ 𝑃
ところが、ここで「必要条件はない」とされている。
これは以下の解釈に帰結する。
(i) ¬∃𝑄 (𝑃⇒𝑄)
→∀𝑄 , ¬(𝑄⊢𝑃)(self-sufficiency)
(ii)∀𝑄 (¬trivial(𝑄) ⇒ ¬(𝑃⇒𝑄))
→∀𝑄, ⊨(𝑃 ↔ (𝑃∧¬𝑄))(non-derivability)
(iii)∀𝑄 ◊ (𝑃∧¬𝑄)
→𝑃 is atomic and irreducible(semantic isolation)
さらにメタ的に表現すれば:
Meaning(𝑃) ⊈ ⋃ [𝑖=1→∞] Meaning(𝑄𝑖)
となる。
ここで、ZFCの内部言語でさらに考察する。
𝑃 : 10分 = 32490円
を以下のような写像として定式化することを考える。
定義1:サービス価格体系を関数とみなし:
𝑓 : 𝐷 → 𝑅
𝐷 ⊆ DurationSpace ⊆ V文字数足りなくて萎えた

もっとみる 
おすすめのクリエーター

かずら
はじめまして、かずらと申します。日本語ネイティブで、英語がある程度わかります。中国語をちょこちょこ勉強中!会話練習のルームも不定期で開いていました!落ち着いていて優しい性格です。こんなわたしですが、よろしくお願いします🥺
フォロワー
1121
投稿数
4569
Ryo
趣味は絵を描いたり
詩を書いたりしています
AIも少し使います
フォロワー
0
投稿数
3394

ゆく
フォロワー
0
投稿数
2333

はちみ津
推しという概念と恋という概念がよくわからん高校1年生(理系)
東方ロストワード中級者(自称)
チョコットランドの星を作りたい
にゃんこ大戦争プレイヤー
基本月から金の7時40分から17時45まで返信不可。(土曜は不定)
近未来魔導録プロジェクトラインオプチャにて公開開始
フォロワー
0
投稿数
527
【J+】e
🌏礼儀と調和 弓道の星 の惑星主です
弓道は高1の時から続けています
自己紹介は投稿のトップにピン留めしてありますので参照して下さい
フォロワー
0
投稿数
446
