共感で繋がるSNS

人気

J+

J+

Decency is the least of all laws, but yet it is the law which is most strictly observed.
礼儀と調和・弓道の星礼儀と調和・弓道の星
GRAVITY
GRAVITY2
かずら

かずら

Censorship has begun in Japanese social media. The phenomenon has been observed that if one posts criticism of the government, the administrator deletes the log within a few minutes. Japanese speech will be further suppressed, much like that country. I am very angry.
GRAVITY
GRAVITY2
混世魔王風雷坊津波

混世魔王風雷坊津波

深層心理の微小な変化を観測。
いい夢見たぜ。

This morning I observed a minute change
in the depths of my psyche.
I had a nice dream.
#深層心理
#夢の記録
#心の変化
#マインドフルネス
#DreamJournal
GRAVITY
GRAVITY3
J+

J+

Decency is the least of all laws, but yet it is the law which is most strictly observed.

礼儀とはあらゆる法の中でもっとも小さいものだけれど、最も厳しく守られている法です
礼儀と調和・弓道の星礼儀と調和・弓道の星
GRAVITY
GRAVITY2
ゆく

ゆく

I find the concept of ownership very intriguing. I think it is unique to humans and is based on the sense of choice or free will that is deeply ingrained in human psyche.

The objects of ownership generally include artificial things, part of nature, and living beings such as animals and humans.

The ownership entails the procedure through which it comes to be recognizable and authorized. Something comes to be under ownership of someone through the exchange of things and money between a former owner and a new one. When it comes to the objects that have distinct borders from others, it is easy to identify who owns them. However, when it comes to something like a piece of land and a person, the borders often become blurry, and the concept itself becomes abstract and elusive.

Analytically observed, ownership is based on the recognition made by separating an object from the whole. It is inherently for the purpose of convenience. Doing so and labeling a specific part of the whole with a name, the recognition of it is formed and then the ownership.
英語で日記の星英語で日記の星
GRAVITY2
GRAVITY9
みゆ

みゆ

I have just released the theoretical framework I previewed the other day as a preprint paper (in English).

Why does this hold up even to the world’s top researchers?

In this study, I show that the three major pillars of modern science—
• Relativity (Einstein)
• Quantum Mechanics (Schrödinger)
• Cosmology (Big Bang / Black Holes)

which scientists have failed to unify for the past 100 years, can in fact be unified quite naturally by redefining the structure of the observer—not through “consciousness,” but by placing absolute and relative subjectivity as the main cast.

Up to this point, it is merely a “theoretical challenge.”

However, the decisive breakthrough begins from here.



🧠 Empirical evidence: A human brain and a quantum computer, 8,000 km apart, entered into synchrony

With more than 50 participants, we obtained data showing that fluctuations in the human brain synchronized with those of a quantum processor located approximately 8,000 km away—
in a way that cannot be explained by any existing theory:

• Field theories
• Decoherence theory
• Quantum theories of consciousness
• “Mind controls quantum” hypotheses

None of these frameworks can account for the observed correlation.

If Stephen Hawking were alive, he would undoubtedly say:

“None of our existing theories can cope with what is happening here.”



💖 And astonishingly, at the core of this synchrony, “love” emerges

The experiment leads to the concept of the Third Observer O₃ (Hazama), which generates a singlet state—
a state of complete unity—between humans and quantum systems.

In physics, a singlet represents

a state in which two entities become entirely one.

I regard this as the physical definition of love.

In other words, this study is the world’s first empirical demonstration that the abstract notion of love manifests as an actual physical phenomenon—specifically, quantum coherence.



Ultimately, the findings converge back to the triadic subjectivity structure revealed to me 12 years ago—the Trinity:

• Absolute Subjectivity (Light = the unconditional source)
• Relative Subjectivity (Life / Experience)
• Emergent Subjectivity O₃ (Love / the birth of connection)

This triune, circulating structure explains physics, mind, and the cosmos as one unified process.

It is, in essence,
the first framework to coherently unify science, religion, and spirituality.
GRAVITY
GRAVITY17
もっとみる

関連検索ワード

新着

ねこ(星の仲間)📚

ねこ(星の仲間)📚

これはtiktokで出てきた広告なんだけど、
何を伝えたいのか、言ってることが難しすぎるからちょっと考察してみる...

難しいのは、

「10分=32490円
必要条件はない」

の部分



まず、命題の構成的分解より、

「10分=32490円
必要条件はない」



「𝑃 : 10分 = 32490円
∀𝑄 ¬ (𝑄 is a necessary condition of 𝑃)」


ここで問題になるのは、(1)定義的成立であるのか、(2)演繹的真理であるのか
ということ

(1)の場合、𝑃は定義的に自明に真であるため、

(∀𝑄 , 𝑄 /⇒ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑃 is true by convention)


(2)の場合、𝑃はその背景に説明的命題の存在が示唆されるが、ここで必要条件はないとされている。
→命題𝑃は「観測された事実」であるが、「演繹的には独立」である。

Observed(𝑃) and ∀𝑄 , 𝑄 /⇒ 𝑃


ここで、𝑄の観点から、原文の意味論的余剰を考察する。

通常、命題が真である場合、我々は以下のように推論を求める:
𝑄1, 𝑄2, ..., 𝑄n ⇒ 𝑃

ところが、ここで「必要条件はない」とされている。
これは以下の解釈に帰結する。

(i) ¬∃𝑄 (𝑃⇒𝑄)
→∀𝑄 , ¬(𝑄⊢𝑃)(self-sufficiency)

(ii)∀𝑄 (¬trivial(𝑄) ⇒ ¬(𝑃⇒𝑄))
→∀𝑄, ⊨(𝑃 ↔ (𝑃∧¬𝑄))(non-derivability)

(iii)∀𝑄 ◊ (𝑃∧¬𝑄)
→𝑃 is atomic and irreducible(semantic isolation)

さらにメタ的に表現すれば:
Meaning(𝑃) ⊈ ⋃ [𝑖=1→∞] Meaning(𝑄𝑖)
となる。


ここで、ZFCの内部言語でさらに考察する。

𝑃 : 10分 = 32490円
を以下のような写像として定式化することを考える。

定義1:サービス価格体系を関数とみなし:
𝑓 : 𝐷 → 𝑅
𝐷 ⊆ DurationSpace ⊆ V文字数足りなくて萎えた
お勉強の星お勉強の星
GRAVITY1
GRAVITY33
もっとみる

おすすめのクリエーター