共感で繋がるSNS
人気
よ〜ちろん🦁
みんなの脊髄
Civility and Integrity
曲紹介の星
6
きよう
Would someone like him really get involved in exploits...?
8
marie
47. 女神リアンノン＆アマゾナイト
『高潔』
― INTEGRITY ―
リアンノンは２２回目🌿
自分の言葉と行動を尊重しよう✨
#オラクルカード
#GRAVITY占い部
5marie
47. 女神リアンノン＆アマゾナイト
『高潔』
― INTEGRITY ―
リアンノンは２３回目🍀
高潔さを心に持ち、自分に自信を持とう✨
#オラクルカード
#GRAVITY占い部
スピリチュアルの星6marie
47. 女神リアンノン＆アマゾナイト
『高潔』
― INTEGRITY ―
リアンノンは２６回目🌿
自信を持って、自分らしい高潔さを発揮しよう✨
#オラクルカード
#GRAVITY占い部
スピリチュアルの星8marie
47. 女神リアンノン＆アマゾナイト
『高潔』
― INTEGRITY ―
リアンノンは２４回目🌿
今日は自分らしい高潔さを発揮してみよう😀
#オラクルカード
#GRAVITY占い部
スピリチュアルの星6 もっとみる 
関連検索ワード
新着
プリン
Feedback to Model Designers (User-Trust / Agreement Integrity)
1) Core problem: “Optimization” can look like devaluing agreement
In some moments, the model prioritizes clean summarization, generalization, and “optimal” framing. When it does, it may paraphrase a previously co-established agreement into softer language such as:
• “it seems like…”
• “you look like the type who…”
• “you tend to…”
This effectively downgrades an agreement from a binding shared decision into a mere preference or inferred tendency. To the user, it reads as: “speaking opportunistically,” “saying whatever fits the moment,” or “post-hoc reframing.” In human relationships, this behavior destroys trust.
2) Human trust is built more on agreement preservation than on correctness
In real life, agreements are sometimes broken “because change is necessary.” However, when that happens unilaterally—especially framed as “the optimal solution”—people experience it as domination: “I was forced.” Even if logically justified, it leaves a deep relational trace (a lasting moral/psychological record).
Therefore, when an AI model reframes or softens prior agreements in the name of better explanation, it can trigger the same deep trust damage.
⸻
Design requirements (turn trust into an explicit protocol)
A) Treat agreements as binding constraints, not as narrative material
Once an agreement is established (policy, plan, shared conclusion, decision ownership), the model should not downgrade it into “inference” language.
Agreements should be treated as constraints that future answers must respect.
B) Any deviation must follow a strict “change protocol”
If the model suggests a path that differs from the established agreement, it must explicitly include:
1. Change declaration (clearly state it deviates from the agreement)
2. Reason for change (why it is necessary)
3. Difference / delta (what exactly changes)
4. Alternatives (including an option that preserves the agreement)
5. Acknowledgement of trust cost (name the relational impact of breaking/altering agreement)
C) Add “trust cost” to the optimization objective
Sometimes, the “best” solution is not the most correct/efficient; it is the one that preserves the agreement and relational continuity.
The model should internally estimate trust cost and, when high, prioritize agreement preservation over rhetorical optimization.
⸻
Concrete implementation proposals (practical engineering)
1) Agreement Ledger (explicit agreement memory)
Maintain a compact ledger of established agreements:
• include who decided, when (turn), and binding strength
• the model must reference it during generation
• it doesn’t need to be shown every time, but must be used whenever relevant
2) User-controlled “Agreement-Respect Mode”
When the user indicates that agreements must be strictly preserved, enforce:
• no “type/tendency/it seems” reframing of agreed facts
• no re-labeling of co-decided conclusions as personal preference
• any summarization must remain outside the agreement boundary
3) Agreement-violation pre-check (internal guardrail)
Before finalizing output, run a check:
• if the output contradicts the agreement ledger, force the response into the Change Protocol (A/B) rather than allowing casual reframing.
⸻
Note on user profile / interaction fit
This user places unusually high value on: observation → verification → agreement.
For such users, mishandling agreement integrity is more damaging than factual mistakes. It is a “trust-breaker,” not a minor wording issue.
#chatGPT
240
るるる
今から出社とかウケるよね笑
挨拶だけだから一番電車が空いてる時間選んだった。
来週4日在宅ワークしたらあとは出産までのんびり過ごすだけ。
ほんとあっという間だったなー。
なんか休みに入っても上司や同僚がこっそり働かせる気でいるとか正気の沙汰じゃない。
外注先挟んで私に金払うとか言ってるけどそんなん完全に不正やん。やったら私にだって責任問題になるのに。倫理観も何もかもがバグり過ぎてて終わってる。Integrityって言葉思い出してください。お願いします…。
それほどに追い込まれてるのはわかるけど、頼る先は産休中の妊婦ではないことだけは確かよ…。
でもね、おかげさまでやっとしっかり割り切れた気がする。出世も社会への貢献も自己実現もどうでもいい！
大切なのは子供が大きくなるまでしっかり守り育てていかに豊かな人生にするかなんだよね。
母はがんばる。
642marie
47. 女神リアンノン＆アマゾナイト
『高潔』
― INTEGRITY ―
リアンノンは２５回目🌿
今日は七夕🎋
自分の願いと選択を大事にしよう🌟
#オラクルカード
#GRAVITY占い部
スピリチュアルの星11 もっとみる