(続き)That is, the heuristics deployed to navigate the epistemic manifold of hypercomplexity simultaneously circumscribe and delimit the boundaries of intelligibility, rendering any purportedly objective metric of cognitive efficacy inherently self-negating.Moreover, within the domain of computational epistemology, the application of modal logic to such systems reveals a bifurcation between deontic necessity and ontological contingency, wherein the modal operators governing knowledge acquisition are themselves subject to an infinite regress of meta-epistemic qualification. This suggests that any attempt at formalizing a universal heuristic for epistemic expansion within hypercomplex systems is, in effect, tantamount to attempting a self-axiomatizing formal system—one that invariably collapses under the weight of its own meta-theoretical dependencies.(2/3)
(続き)Thus, one arrives at the inescapable conclusion that the epistemic paradox inherent in meta-cognitive heuristics within hypercomplex systems is not merely a function of computational or logical limitation but an intrinsic feature of the ontological architecture underpinning cognition itself.(3/3)
