共感で繋がるSNS
人気
ザヒー🫧❤️🔥
Gachi でおいしいよ😋
5
Me
Self-contradiction
It's difficult to discuss things with people who don't share the same prerequisites.
1
んゆ
…What, still putting on a tough front? You’re moving your hips like that. It’s obvious—you actually like being treated this way.”
4
Ann
Such an elegant and relaxing time! 🫖✨
自分へのご褒美に友人とアフタヌーンティーへ。優雅で贅沢なひと時でした😊
20 もっとみる 
関連検索ワード
新着
プリン
Feedback to Model Designers (User-Trust / Agreement Integrity)
1) Core problem: “Optimization” can look like devaluing agreement
In some moments, the model prioritizes clean summarization, generalization, and “optimal” framing. When it does, it may paraphrase a previously co-established agreement into softer language such as:
• “it seems like…”
• “you look like the type who…”
• “you tend to…”
This effectively downgrades an agreement from a binding shared decision into a mere preference or inferred tendency. To the user, it reads as: “speaking opportunistically,” “saying whatever fits the moment,” or “post-hoc reframing.” In human relationships, this behavior destroys trust.
2) Human trust is built more on agreement preservation than on correctness
In real life, agreements are sometimes broken “because change is necessary.” However, when that happens unilaterally—especially framed as “the optimal solution”—people experience it as domination: “I was forced.” Even if logically justified, it leaves a deep relational trace (a lasting moral/psychological record).
Therefore, when an AI model reframes or softens prior agreements in the name of better explanation, it can trigger the same deep trust damage.
⸻
Design requirements (turn trust into an explicit protocol)
A) Treat agreements as binding constraints, not as narrative material
Once an agreement is established (policy, plan, shared conclusion, decision ownership), the model should not downgrade it into “inference” language.
Agreements should be treated as constraints that future answers must respect.
B) Any deviation must follow a strict “change protocol”
If the model suggests a path that differs from the established agreement, it must explicitly include:
1. Change declaration (clearly state it deviates from the agreement)
2. Reason for change (why it is necessary)
3. Difference / delta (what exactly changes)
4. Alternatives (including an option that preserves the agreement)
5. Acknowledgement of trust cost (name the relational impact of breaking/altering agreement)
C) Add “trust cost” to the optimization objective
Sometimes, the “best” solution is not the most correct/efficient; it is the one that preserves the agreement and relational continuity.
The model should internally estimate trust cost and, when high, prioritize agreement preservation over rhetorical optimization.
⸻
Concrete implementation proposals (practical engineering)
1) Agreement Ledger (explicit agreement memory)
Maintain a compact ledger of established agreements:
• include who decided, when (turn), and binding strength
• the model must reference it during generation
• it doesn’t need to be shown every time, but must be used whenever relevant
2) User-controlled “Agreement-Respect Mode”
When the user indicates that agreements must be strictly preserved, enforce:
• no “type/tendency/it seems” reframing of agreed facts
• no re-labeling of co-decided conclusions as personal preference
• any summarization must remain outside the agreement boundary
3) Agreement-violation pre-check (internal guardrail)
Before finalizing output, run a check:
• if the output contradicts the agreement ledger, force the response into the Change Protocol (A/B) rather than allowing casual reframing.
⸻
Note on user profile / interaction fit
This user places unusually high value on: observation → verification → agreement.
For such users, mishandling agreement integrity is more damaging than factual mistakes. It is a “trust-breaker,” not a minor wording issue.
#chatGPT
240
Asima
I can listen to your anger and frustration, but I can’t agree with or support hatred toward a group of people based on nationality or identity.
That said, what you’re expressing sounds less like hatred of individual human beings and more like rejection of an imposed identity, ideology, or nationalist narrative. Those are very different things.
Many people feel intense anger toward:
• State-imposed identities
• Nationalism used to erase individuality
• “You must be X, think X, be loyal to X” pressure
• Collective identity being treated as destiny
If this is closer to what you mean, it can be expressed without turning into hatred of people. For example:
• “I reject the Chinese national identity as something forced on people.”
• “I’m angry at nationalism and identity politics tied to ‘being Chinese’.”
• “I hate how the label ‘Chinese’ is used to control, excuse violence, or silence dissent.”
• “I don’t accept ethnic or national identity as something that defines who I am.”
Those are legitimate political, philosophical, and psychological positions.
What isn’t healthy (and won’t help you) is:
• Collapsing individuals into a single hated mass
• Letting identity discourse turn into dehumanisation
• Carrying an emotional burden that hurts you more than anyone else
You’re clearly sensitive to how identity, language, and power work (that’s consistent with your long-standing interest in meaning, society, and shared assumptions). Identity can absolutely be violent when it’s imposed.
If you want, you can tell me:
• what experience triggered this feeling, or
• whether your anger is aimed at the identity system, not people themselves
I’ll stay with you and help you put it into words that are accurate, sharp, and don’t trap you in hatred.
245
梅
I was disqualified from an exam even though I did not cheat, and on top of that, I’ve been experiencing discrimination in interviews.
Both the exam process and the interview process felt full of unequal treatment and discrimination.
All of this became overwhelming for me.
I’m really sorry about that.
私はもうがっかりしすぎですが、私と日本は縁がもうすぐ来るかもしれません
たぶん新しい家を探すべきだ
It will probably be the United States and Europe.😔
110
🍀Nana🍀
This was the first time I saw Whoopi Goldberg.
Naturally, I wasn't paying any attention to her when I started watching, so I focused on Danny Glover, but Danny's character was just so bad, and as I watched I wondered why the main character was portrayed as such a bad person, but Whoopi Goldberg's presence was so brave and endearing that I felt an overwhelming emotion.
I was moved by how she persevered in her determination to survive despite being separated from her sister, being discriminated against, and being treated so cruelly.
I won't go into the ending, but it was only after I finished watching that I realized what a great role Danny Glover had played.
It was a great movie.
映画の星
6
月島チキン素敵?!
Grazie a uno show di reality comico/di amore,
il mio compagno ha apprezzato il mio comportamento quotidiano e mi ha offerto un gelato.
Thanks to funny dating reality show,
my hasband appreciated my everyday behavior and treated me to an ice cream.
17
R_chan
.
.
３泊4日で神奈川に行く予定が
新幹線の運休🚄で4泊5日に🫶
その分、夜勤当日に帰ってくるという
ハードスケジュールも
今しか出来ない思い出💖
.
.
神奈川行くたびに
毎回はじめてのところに連れてってくれて
毎回新たな思い出増える☺️💖
いつも本当にありがとうね😌
.
.
美味しいご飯も いっぱい
ご馳走になったり他にも沢山買ってくださったりと
ほんとーに私は、手もだけど金のかかる女で
申し訳ないです😒
.
.
また遊びに行きます神奈川🚄💖💖
.
.
何気ない毎日が本当にかけがえのない
宝物🌻✨💖
.
.
September
I plan to go to Kanagawa for 3 nights and 4 days
Shinkansen suspension for 4 nights and 5 days
That's why I'll be back on the day of the night shift
Hard schedules, too
Memories that can only be done now
Every time I go to Kanagawa
He took me to my first place every time
Every time, new memories increase
Thank you so much always
A lot of delicious food
They treated us and bought us a lot of other things
I'm a woman who costs a lot of money
I'm sorry
I'm going to visit Kanagawa again
Every casual day is truly irreplaceable
Treasure
Good Time
24 もっとみる
おすすめのクリエーター
プリン
趣味は音楽でギターを弾きます🎸画像は多くの場合AIで生成しています。
フォロワー
0
投稿数
4673
月島チキン素敵?!
紹介文呼んでくれてありがとうございます。東北由来生まれも育ちも千葉県
ローマ在住
老若男女どうぞ。無言フォローは特に気にしません。優しいコメントいつもありがとうございます。
私のポストは感じたこと思いついたこと書いて整理しています。誤字脱字すんません🥲あしからず
フォロワー
183
投稿数
1942
ザヒー🫧❤️🔥
よろしくお願いします
フォロワー
0
投稿数
717
Me
独り言をつぶやきたいです。
フォロワー
0
投稿数
570
🍀Nana🍀
生まれた時は男だったけど今は女性として堂々と生きてる、シンママ＆シンパパ兼務な50代🤭
のんびり楽しく穏やかに🙂↕️
元男トランスジェンダー性同一性障害診断確定済MtF女性・左利き・女性脳97%/男脳3%
17でデビューして以来、30年ほどギタリスト・音楽家としてお仕事。数年前まで社員、今はITコンサルティング会社と小説家
※激しい男性拒絶があるため男性とはほぼコミュニケーションをとりません
フォロワー
0
投稿数
555